ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
Molecular expression of Forkhead Box C2 gene (FOXC2) and Prospero homeobox gene (PROX-1) in oral squamous carcinoma and their correlation with clinicopathological parameters: A prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic relevance of prospero homeobox 1 and metastasis tumor antigen 1 in patients with malignant salivary gland tumors: a clinicopathological study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Forkhead box C2 gene (FOXC2) acts as an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) inducer while Prospero homeobox 1 gene (PROX-1) function as a regulator of lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). It is presumed that PROX-1 has both tumour-suppressive and oncogenic effects. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the role of PROX-1 and FOXC2 in the invasion and progression of OSCC cases and to correlate their expression with various histopathological parameters. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a total sample size of 52 OSCC tissues and histologically tumour-free margins of 20. mRNA expression and protein levels of FOXC2 and PROX-1 were evaluated using real-time PCR and sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques. Chi-square analysis and correlation analysis were done. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated the survival rate. Results: Mean Ct values of FOXC2 were 1.915 ± 0.519 and PROX-1 was 0.061 ± 0.173. There was a significant 2-fold increase in the FOXC2 expression and a 0.5-fold decrease in the PROX-1 expression in OSCC tissue. Increased levels of FOXC2 protein and decreased levels of PROX-1 with a mean difference of 1.64 ± 0.73 ng/ml and 1.27 ± 0.33 ng/ml were observed in OSCC compared to histologically tumour-free margins. A significant positive correlation was found between the FOXC2 expression and clinicopathological parameters such as staging, perineural invasion (PNI) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) whereas PROX-1 showed a significant negative correlation with histopathological parameters such as staging, PNI, LVI and tumour staging. There was a significant positive correlation between the PROX-1 and histologically tumour-free margins in disease-free survival patients ( Conclusion: FOXC2 and PROX-1 expressions were correlated with lymphovascular invasion, OSCC tumour staging and PNI. Thus, FOXC2 and PROX-1 could be possible therapeutic targets in the treatment of OSCC that can inhibit the EMT in OSCC and thereby favouring a better prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.