Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157814›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Visual effects on tactile stimulation and its perception: A pilot study using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Akitoshi Seiyama, Tatsuro Miura, Sayaka Okahashi, Nami Konishi, Monte Cassim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akitoshi SeiyamaCreative Design and Data Science Center, Akita International University, Japan.
Tatsuro MiuraCreative Design and Data Science Center, Akita International University, Japan.
Sayaka OkahashiCreative Design and Data Science Center, Akita International University, Japan.
Nami KonishiCreative Design and Data Science Center, Akita International University, Japan.
Monte CassimCreative Design and Data Science Center, Akita International University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rubber hand illusion, visual information affects tactile information, whereas in the mirror box illusion, visual information has the opposite effect. However, its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. As one of the reasons, non-invasive neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, and electroencephalography, often fail to detect complex and fragile responses in the sensory-motor cortex. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we examined neural activity during tactile tracing on a sine-shaped acrylic board to investigate the effects of (1) visual information and (2) the spatial frequency of the sine shape on brain activity. We used spatial frequencies of 2-3 and 20-30 Hz as low- and high-tactile stimuli, respectively. Two types of experiments, with and without an acrylic board, were conducted. Participants performed the tracing tasks with their index finger at 1 Hz of temporal frequency of a 200 mm length of the acrylic board as main tasks and only space moving without touching as a control task. We show effect of visual information on neural activation, including not only activation intensity but also activation patterns.•Testing of mutual effects of vision and haptics.•Testing of sensory-motor paradox using NIRS.•A high NIRS sensitivity to stimulus-induced hemodynamic change.

Indexed as

Motor cortexNear-infrared spectroscopy for detecting neural activity during tactile stimulationNeurorehabilitationNon-invasive neuroimagingSensory-motor paradoxSomatosensory cortex

Identifiers

PMID39157814
PMCPMC11326913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.