ArticleMethodsX2024
Visual effects on tactile stimulation and its perception: A pilot study using near-infrared spectroscopy.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effects of mirror visual feedback involved network priming on embodiment perception in healthy subjects: a proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In rubber hand illusion, visual information affects tactile information, whereas in the mirror box illusion, visual information has the opposite effect. However, its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. As one of the reasons, non-invasive neuroimaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, and electroencephalography, often fail to detect complex and fragile responses in the sensory-motor cortex. Using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we examined neural activity during tactile tracing on a sine-shaped acrylic board to investigate the effects of (1) visual information and (2) the spatial frequency of the sine shape on brain activity. We used spatial frequencies of 2-3 and 20-30 Hz as low- and high-tactile stimuli, respectively. Two types of experiments, with and without an acrylic board, were conducted. Participants performed the tracing tasks with their index finger at 1 Hz of temporal frequency of a 200 mm length of the acrylic board as main tasks and only space moving without touching as a control task. We show effect of visual information on neural activation, including not only activation intensity but also activation patterns.•Testing of mutual effects of vision and haptics.•Testing of sensory-motor paradox using NIRS.•A high NIRS sensitivity to stimulus-induced hemodynamic change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.