Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157765›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Prokaryote communities along a source-to-estuary river continuum in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.

Carolina O de Santana, Pieter Spealman, Eddy Oliveira, David Gresham, Taise de Jesus, Fabio Chinalia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carolina O de SantanaDepartment of Exact Sciences (DEXA), Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9385-0199
Pieter SpealmanDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7105-284X
Eddy OliveiraDepartment of Biology (DCBIO), Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil.
David GreshamDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4028-0364
Taise de JesusDepartment of Exact Sciences (DEXA), Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-9554
Fabio ChinaliaInstitute of Health Sciences, Laboratory of Biotechnology and Ecology of Micro-Organisms, Institute of Health Sciences, Salvador, BA, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia–Fapesb
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activities of microbiomes in river sediments play an important role in sustaining ecosystem functions by driving many biogeochemical cycles. However, river ecosystems are frequently affected by anthropogenic activities, which may lead to microbial biodiversity loss and/or changes in ecosystem functions and related services. While parts of the Atlantic Forest biome stretching along much of the eastern coast of South America are protected by governmental conservation efforts, an estimated 89% of these areas in Brazil are under threat. This adds urgency to the characterization of prokaryotic communities in this vast and highly diverse biome. Here, we present prokaryotic sediment communities in the tropical Juliana River system at three sites, an upstream site near the river source in the mountains (Source) to a site in the middle reaches (Valley) and an estuarine site near the urban center of Ituberá (Mangrove). The diversity and composition of the communities were compared at these sites, along with environmental conditions, the former by using qualitative and quantitative analyses of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. While the communities included distinct populations at each site, a suite of core taxa accounted for the majority of the populations at all sites. Prokaryote diversity was highest in the sediments of the Mangrove site and lowest at the Valley site. The highest number of genera exclusive to a given site was found at the Source site, followed by the Mangrove site, which contained some archaeal genera not present at the freshwater sites. Copper (Cu) concentrations were related to differences in communities among sites, but none of the other environmental factors we determined was found to have a significant influence. This may be partly due to an urban imprint on the Mangrove site by providing organic carbon and nutrients

Indexed as

Geologic SedimentsRiversRNA, Ribosomal, 16SArchaeaBacteriaBiodiversityBrazilEstuariesForestsMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SMicrobial ecologyRainforest ecosystemRiverine ecosystemSediment microbesValley-Estuary continuum

Identifiers

PMID39157765
PMCPMC11328836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.