Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157708›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Functional, Cosmetic, and Psychological Outcomes after Rhinoplasty.

Goran Omer, Stefano Girolamo, Binaiy Hamatofiq, Sozyar Tofiq, Mawa Aziz Mohammed, Diya Abdulkarim, Shnya Mohammed, Mohammed Gubari, Imad Habibullah, Ayman Mustafa and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07580573 (Use of Artificial Intelligence in Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes in Rhinoplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07580573 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Assessment of Aesthetic Outcomes in Rhinoplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsRhinoplasty, AI (Artificial Intelligence)ArmsAI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Why Do They Return? A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experiences and Ethical Dimensions of Revision Rhinoplasty in Iran.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychosocial Factors Surrounding Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Goran OmerFrom the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Stefano GirolamoOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Binaiy HamatofiqFrom the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Sozyar TofiqFrom the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Mawa Aziz MohammedFrom the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Diya AbdulkarimFrom the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Shnya MohammedFrom the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Mohammed GubariDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
Imad HabibullahSmart Health Tower, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Ayman MustafaSmart Health Tower, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Mariwan FatahFrom the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Sarwat AhmedSulaimani Teaching Hospital, Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq.
Fahmi KakamadFrom the College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rhinoplasty is conducted to address both cosmetic and functional objectives. It is not merely a cosmetic procedure, as it frequently aims to improve function by enhancing nasal breathing and removing congenital or acquired obstructions. The current study aims to determine the functional, cosmetic, and psychological outcomes of rhinoplasties. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. The data were collected using an interview and an online Google form. A chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between qualitative variables and quantitative variables using frequency, percentage, and mean for quantitative variables. Each variable's Results: Of the 234 patients enrolled in this study, 69.2% were women, whereas 30.8% were men, with a mean age of 22.86 ± 4.546 years. In terms of satisfaction, functional satisfaction accounted for about 59% of all satisfaction, cosmetic satisfaction was 63.2%, and psychological satisfaction was 70.9%. The primary reason for surgery was cosmetic (45%). Conclusion: The majority of enrolled participants were satisfied with their functional outcomes, whereas their satisfaction with psychological and cosmetic outcomes was moderate.

Identifiers

PMID39157708
PMCPMC11326470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.