Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157662›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Machine learning-based non-destructive terahertz detection of seed quality in peanut.

Weibin Jiang, Jun Wang, Ruiquan Lin, Riqing Chen, Wencheng Chen, Xin Xie, Kan-Lin Hsiung, Hsin-Yu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weibin JiangCollege of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Jun WangCollege of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Ruiquan LinCollege of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Riqing ChenCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China.
Wencheng ChenCollege of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Xin XieCollege of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Kan-Lin HsiungDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 35002, Taiwan.
Hsin-Yu ChenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 35002, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid identification of peanut seed quality is crucial for public health. In this study, we present a terahertz wave imaging system using a convolutional neural network (CNN) machine learning approach. Terahertz waves are capable of penetrating the seed shell to identify the quality of peanuts without causing any damage to the seeds. The specificity of seed quality on terahertz wave images is investigated, and the image characteristics of five different qualities are summarized. Terahertz wave images are digitized and used for training and testing of convolutional neural networks, resulting in a high model accuracy of 98.7% in quality identification. The trained THz-CNNs system can accurately identify standard, mildewed, defective, dried and germinated seeds, with an average detection time of 2.2 s. This process does not require any sample preparation steps such as concentration or culture. Our method swiftly and accurately assesses shelled seed quality non-destructively.

Indexed as

AflatoxinMachine learningPeanutQuality identificationTerahertz imaging technology

Identifiers

PMID39157662
PMCPMC11327472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.