Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157657›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2024

Elucidating the effects of precooked treatments on the quality attributes of red swamp crayfish (

Wensi Xu, Qifu Yang, Deyang Li, Xiaoyang Liu, Pinhong Yang, Liang Song, Dayong Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wensi XuSchool of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, PR China.
Qifu YangSchool of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, PR China.
Deyang LiSchool of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, PR China.
Xiaoyang LiuSchool of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, PR China.
Pinhong YangCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, PR China.
Liang SongSchool of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, PR China.
Dayong ZhouSchool of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precooked treatments are essential in food processing, extending beyond mere sterilization to include the enhancement of nutritional value, flavor profile, and digestibility. This research scrutinizes the effects of water boiling and microwaving on red swamp crayfish, two distinct precooked methodologies. A comparative analytical framework has been employed to assess the efficacy of two precooked methods across a spectrum of quality indicators, including aerobic plate counts, texture, nutrient composition, volatile compound characterization, protein oxidation, and digestive properties. The findings revealed that both water boiling and microwaving effectively reduced bacterial counts to a safe level of 500 CFU/g. Microwave precooking facilitated a moderate oxidation of lipids in crayfish, preferentially liberating flavor compounds, thereby enhancing their sensory attributes. The boiling process imparted a pronounced denaturation to proteins, consequently augmenting the hardness of the crayfish. Notably, the enhanced digestibility of boiled crayfish proteins results from the denaturing action of boiling, promoting efficient protein digestion.

Indexed as

Digestion characteristicsMicroscopic architecturePrecooked treatmentProcambarus clarkiaQuality Implications

Identifiers

PMID39157657
PMCPMC11328012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.