Similarities and differences of bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from acute myeloid leukemia patients in terms of cellular heterogeneity and ex-vivo drug sensitivity.

Background: Bone marrow (BM) evaluation is the de facto standard for diagnosis, molecular analysis, risk stratification, and therapy response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but in patients with a high number of circulating blast cells, the peripheral blood (PB) sample could provide similar information as BM. However, there is no large-scale molecular study comparing the two specimens in terms of their gene expression profiles, cellular heterogeneities, and ex-vivo drug sensitivity. Methodology: We used (i) the BEAT-AML cohort each with detailed molecular data; (ii) cell-type deconvolution to estimate leukemic and immune cell proportions between specimen types; (iii) differential expression (DE) and drug-cell type association analysis; and (iv) logistic regression models to assess the association between induction therapy response, cell-type composition and first-line drug treatment. Results: Results: We identified 207 patients having BM and 116 patients having PB samples. There was a total of 1271 DE genes (false discovery rate < 0.05) between BM and PB; the top enriched pathways in terms of DE genes belong to the immune system pathways. Aggregated ex-vivo drug response profiles from the two specimens were largely similar, as were the cellular components, except for the GMP-like cell type (17% in BM vs. 5% in PB, Results: Conclusions: Even though there are molecular and cellular differences between BM and PB samples, they show many similarities in ex-vivo drug response profiles, indicating the clinical utility of the substantially less-invasive PB samples.