Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157607›Full record

ArticleEJHaem2024

Kevin C Graf, James A Davis, Alyssa Cendagorta, Katelynn Granger, Kelly J Gaffney, Kimberly Green, Brian T Hess, Hamza Hashmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJHaem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. EJHaem · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin C GrafDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7959-4529
James A DavisDepartment of Pharmacy Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7978-1652
Alyssa CendagortaDepartment of Pharmacy Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Katelynn GrangerDepartment of Pharmacy Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Kelly J GaffneyDepartment of Pharmacy Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Kimberly GreenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Brian T HessDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.
Hamza HashmiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teclistamab is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed bispecific T-cell engager approved for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are well-documented treatment -related adverse events of teclistamab. The prescribing information recommends step-up dosing on days 1, 4, and 7 with 48-72 h of inpatient observation after each dose to monitor for CRS. This leads to a more than weeklong hospital stay, adding to the cost of therapy, resource utilization, and patient inconvenience. Here, we present a single center retrospective analysis addressing the safety and utility of a condensed step-up dosing schedule for teclistamab. All patients who were treated with teclistamab from November 2022 to August 2023 at the Medical University of South Carolina were included in the analysis. Patients received subcutaneous (SC) teclistamab with step-up doses (0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg) separated by either 2 or 3 (48-72 h) before the administration of the first full (1.5 mg/kg) dose (days 1, 3, and 5 'condensed' schedule or days 1, 4, and 7 'standard' schedule, respectively). All patients were hospitalized for the two step-up doses and first full dose of teclistamab and received pre-medications prior to each dose. Patients could be discharged after a minimum of 24 h following the full dose, if they did not have any CRS or ICANS. Relevant data regarding incidence, severity, and onset of CRS was collected. Statistical analysis was completed to assess the probability of fever with the first full dose of teclistamab based on incidence of fever with previous doses. A total of 25 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (7/25) of patients underwent the standard step up while the remaining 72% (18/25) underwent a condensed step up of teclistamab. More than half (53%, 13/25) of the patients experienced CRS during step up dosing. Grades 1 and 2 CRS occurred in 48% (12/25) and 4% (1/25) patients, respectively. Of the 13 patients that experienced CRS, 30% (4/13) fevered with the first dose, 84% (11/13) fevered with the second dose, and one patient developed fever after the third dose. The negative predictive value of being 'fever free' after doses 1 and 2 and remaining 'fever free' throughout hospitalization was 0.92. The median length of hospital stay among the 1, 3, and 5 step up group was 6 days (6-25) and 70% (14/20) of patients were discharged from the hospital within 7 days of treatment initiation. This report demonstrates the utility of a condensed step-up schedule for teclistamab initiation. The schedule was found to be safe and reduced hospital length of stay. These results should prompt consideration of shorter hospital stays for patients who do not experience CRS and raise the possibility of outpatient administration with close observation.

Indexed as

immunotherapymultiple myelomamyeloma therapy

Identifiers

PMID39157607
PMCPMC11327708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.