ArticleEJHaem2024
Article in EJHaem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of teclistamab for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Condensed vs. Standard Step-Up Dosing Schedule of Talquetamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative efficacy and safety of bispecific antibody teclistamab versus CAR-T cell therapies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a retrospective evaluation.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Guarding the heart in the era of immunotherapies: insights for cardio-oncology practice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Saudi experts statement on advancing multiple myeloma treatment: the evolving role of bispecific antibodies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Teclistamab is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed bispecific T-cell engager approved for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are well-documented treatment -related adverse events of teclistamab. The prescribing information recommends step-up dosing on days 1, 4, and 7 with 48-72 h of inpatient observation after each dose to monitor for CRS. This leads to a more than weeklong hospital stay, adding to the cost of therapy, resource utilization, and patient inconvenience. Here, we present a single center retrospective analysis addressing the safety and utility of a condensed step-up dosing schedule for teclistamab. All patients who were treated with teclistamab from November 2022 to August 2023 at the Medical University of South Carolina were included in the analysis. Patients received subcutaneous (SC) teclistamab with step-up doses (0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg) separated by either 2 or 3 (48-72 h) before the administration of the first full (1.5 mg/kg) dose (days 1, 3, and 5 'condensed' schedule or days 1, 4, and 7 'standard' schedule, respectively). All patients were hospitalized for the two step-up doses and first full dose of teclistamab and received pre-medications prior to each dose. Patients could be discharged after a minimum of 24 h following the full dose, if they did not have any CRS or ICANS. Relevant data regarding incidence, severity, and onset of CRS was collected. Statistical analysis was completed to assess the probability of fever with the first full dose of teclistamab based on incidence of fever with previous doses. A total of 25 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (7/25) of patients underwent the standard step up while the remaining 72% (18/25) underwent a condensed step up of teclistamab. More than half (53%, 13/25) of the patients experienced CRS during step up dosing. Grades 1 and 2 CRS occurred in 48% (12/25) and 4% (1/25) patients, respectively. Of the 13 patients that experienced CRS, 30% (4/13) fevered with the first dose, 84% (11/13) fevered with the second dose, and one patient developed fever after the third dose. The negative predictive value of being 'fever free' after doses 1 and 2 and remaining 'fever free' throughout hospitalization was 0.92. The median length of hospital stay among the 1, 3, and 5 step up group was 6 days (6-25) and 70% (14/20) of patients were discharged from the hospital within 7 days of treatment initiation. This report demonstrates the utility of a condensed step-up schedule for teclistamab initiation. The schedule was found to be safe and reduced hospital length of stay. These results should prompt consideration of shorter hospital stays for patients who do not experience CRS and raise the possibility of outpatient administration with close observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.