ReviewEJHaem2024
Multiple myeloma in Latin America: A systematic review.
Review in EJHaem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden of Treatment, Treatment Sequencing and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Multiple Myeloma in Latin America: A Targeted Literature Review.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma in second relapse in Colombia (freedomm): a multicenter observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Emerging Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma in Argentina and Brazil: Insights from the TOTEMM Study in the Private Healthcare Sector.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Practical Guidance on the Clinical Management of Ocular Adverse Events Associated with Belantamab Mafodotin for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Latin American Expert Panel Recommendations.Oncology and therapy · 2025Article
- Transplant in myeloma: individualized approaches needed depending on context, access and biology.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of multiple myeloma (MM) has surged globally, particularly in Latin American countries, and is attributable to an aging population and increased life expectancy. This systematic review analyzes the epidemiology, patient characteristics, and treatment outcomes for MM in selected Latin American countries: Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay. PubMed and the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), conference abstracts (between June 2019 and June 2022), and GLOBOCAN registry (January 2010 to June 2022) were electronically searched. Qualitative analysis employed the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. Among the 586 screened articles, 26 met the inclusion criteria. The participants' median age ranged from 54 to 67 years. GLOBOCAN data revealed that for MM, Brazil and Uruguay had the highest and lowest incidence, 5-year prevalence, and mortality, respectively. Immunoglobulin G was the most common subtype detected. Stage III was frequently diagnosed. Though many approved drugs are available and bispecific antibodies hold promise as a future therapy, limited access, especially for CAR-T cell-based therapy remains a concern. The incidence of MM is increasing in Latin America. Resource constraints and costs hinder access to novel drugs and regimens. Understanding disease patterns and patient characteristics is vital to improve MM management in these countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.