Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157431›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2024

Recommendations for Improving End-User Programming Education: A Case Study with Undergraduate Chemistry Students.

William Fuchs, Ashley Ringer McDonald, Aakash Gautam, Ayaan M Kazerouni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William FuchsDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, California 93405, United States.
Ashley Ringer McDonaldDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, California 93405, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4381-1239
Aakash GautamDepartment of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States.
Ayaan M KazerouniDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, California 93405, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6574-1278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programming is widespread in multiple domains and is being integrated into various discipline-specific university courses where, like students in a typical introductory computing course, students from other disciplines face challenges with learning to program. We offer a case study in which we study undergraduate students majoring in either chemistry or biochemistry as they learn programming in a physical chemistry course sequence. Using surveys and think-aloud sessions with students, we conducted a thematic content analysis to explain the challenges they face in this endeavor. We found that students struggled to transfer their programming knowledge to new representations and problems, and they did not have strategies in place for solving problems with programming. These facts combine to lower students' confidence in their programming abilities, making it less likely that they will reach for computing to help solve domain-specific problems. We recommend that students in end-user programming contexts be explicitly taught the skills of abstraction, decomposition, and metacognitive awareness as they pertain to programming.

Identifiers

PMID39157431
PMCPMC11327961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.