Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157427›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Applying a synergistic mindsets intervention to an esports context.

Maciej Behnke, Daniel Lakens, Kate Petrova, Patrycja Chwiłkowska, Szymon Jęśko Białek, Maciej Kłoskowski, Wadim Krzyżaniak, Patryk Maciejewski, Lukasz D Kaczmarek, Kacper Szymański and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maciej BehnkeFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-4556
Daniel LakensHuman-Technology Interaction Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0247-239X
Kate PetrovaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Patrycja ChwiłkowskaFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Szymon Jęśko BiałekFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Maciej KłoskowskiFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Wadim KrzyżaniakFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Patryk MaciejewskiFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Lukasz D KaczmarekFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Kacper SzymańskiFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Jeremy P JamiesonDepartment of Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective responses during stressful, high-stakes situations can play an important role in shaping performance. For example, feeling shaky and nervous at a job interview can undermine performance, whereas feeling excited during that same interview can optimize performance. Thus, affect regulation-the way people influence their affective responses-might play a key role in determining high-stakes outcomes. To test this idea, we adapted a synergistic mindsets intervention (SMI) (Yeager

Indexed as

affectbiopsychosocialchallenge and threatmindsetreappraisalstress appraisals

Identifiers

PMID39157427
PMCPMC11328966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.