ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2024
Predicting Asthma Exacerbation Risk in the Adult South Korean Population Using Integrated Health Data and Machine Learning Models.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology With Environmental Exposures.Allergy · 2026Review
- Critical Care Nurses' Experiences with Endotracheal Suctioning in Critically Ill Older Adults Patients: A Phenomenological Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Change in Exacerbation Rate of Asthma Patients before and after COVID-19 Infection.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease with significant burden; exacerbations can severely affect quality of life and healthcare costs. Advances in big data analysis and artificial intelligence have made it easier to predict future exacerbations more accurately. This study used an integrated dataset of Korean National Health Insurance, meteorological, air pollution, and viral data from national public databases to develop a model to predict asthma exacerbations on a daily basis in South Korea. We merged these sources and applied random forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM machine learning models to compare their performances at predicting future exacerbations. Of the models, XGBoost (AUROC of 0.68 and accuracy of 0.96) and LightGBM (AUROC of 0.67 and accuracy of 0.96) were the most promising. Common important variables were the number of visits and exacerbations per year, and medical resource utilization, including the prescription of asthma medications. Comorbid diabetes, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux, arthritis, metabolic syndrome, osteoporosis, and ischemic heart disease were also associated with elevated exacerbation risk. The models examined in this study highlight the importance of previous exacerbations, use of medical resources, and comorbidities in the prediction of future exacerbations in patients with asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.