Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157383›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Characterization of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer brain metastasis.

Jingrong Li, Nanping Lin, Shengcen Zhang, Lihong Weng, Chen Chen, Wenshi Ou, Yingping Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblast subtypes in the prostate cancer microenvironment and their clinical implications: prognostic model construction and therapeutic target exploration based on bioinformatics analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingrong LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Nanping LinDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Shengcen ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Lihong WengFujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Wenshi OuDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Yingping CaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The difference in the tumor microenvironment (TME) between primary breast cancer (PBC) and breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is still unknown. Herein, we present the landscape of the TME in PBC and BCBM to better understand the process of BCBM. Methods: The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used to obtain suitable PBC and BCBM data. Hub genes that were differentially expressed between the two groups were searched. Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG were used to define the gene's function. Single-cell data were also analyzed to determine the difference between PBC and BCBM. Results: Two datasets (GSE100534 and GSE125989) were used to search for hub genes, and 79 genes were either upregulated or downregulated between the two groups. Four hub genes (COL1A1, PDGFR, MMP3 and FZD7) were related to prognosis. GO and KEGG analyses showed that extracellular matrix and focal adhesion play major roles in the metastasis process. Another two datasets (GSE176078 and GSE186344) were enrolled for single-cell analysis. Single-cell analysis demonstrated that immune cells (66.6 %) form the main part of PBC, while cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) (21.7 %) are the main component of BCBM. Immune cell proportion analysis showed that CD4+/CD8+ T cells (28.9 % and 14.3 %, respectively) and macrophages(M2) accounted for the majority of cells in PBC and BCBM, respectively. Further analysis of the classification of CAFs showed that apCAFs were significantly higher in PBC. Conclusions: This study presents the landscape of BCBM with hub gene searching and single-cell analysis. Showing the difference in the tumor/immune microenvironment of PBC and BCBM, would be beneficial to explore immunotherapy and targeted therapy for BCBM.

Indexed as

apCAFBreast cancer brain metastasisCOL1A1Immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39157383
PMCPMC11328047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.