ArticleHeliyon2024
Revealing alcoholization-related volatile compounds and determining alcoholization indices in tobacco using GC-IMS coupled with chemometrics.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alcoholization is an integral part of tobacco processing and volatile compounds are key to assessing tobacco alcoholization. In this study, a total of 154 volatiles from nine categories were determined by gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) from four grades of tobacco, of which 114 were better identified. And then, the dynamic trends of volatile compounds with significant changes in tobacco alcoholization were analyzed. The relevant volatiles with the alcoholization indices (AIs) (R > 0.8) were screened as indicators of tobacco alcoholization. Cinnamyl isobutyrate, linolenic acid alcohol, propanoic acid-M and propanoic acid-D in all tobacco samples were highly correlated with the AIs and tended to increase during the alcoholization process. In addition, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), back-propagation neural network (BPNN) and random forest (RF) classifiers were constructed for discrimination of tobacco AIs. Three classifiers trained with a combination of 20 volatiles achieved satisfactory results with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 (LDA), 0.94 (BPNN) and 0.97 (RF), respectively. The RF classifier gained optimal accuracy of 100 % and 96.1 % for the training and test sets, respectively. The study confirmed that GC-IMS can be used to characterize the changes of volatile compounds in tobacco during alcoholization and combined with machine learning to achieve the determination of AIs. The results of the study may provide a new means for the tobacco industry to monitor the alcoholization process and determine the degree of alcoholization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.