ArticleJournal of applied statistics2024
The spike-and-slab lasso and scalable algorithm to accommodate multinomial outcomes in variable selection problems.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spike-and-slab prior distributions are used to impose variable selection in Bayesian regression-style problems with many possible predictors. These priors are a mixture of two zero-centered distributions with differing variances, resulting in different shrinkage levels on parameter estimates based on whether they are relevant to the outcome. The spike-and-slab lasso assigns mixtures of double exponential distributions as priors for the parameters. This framework was initially developed for linear models, later developed for generalized linear models, and shown to perform well in scenarios requiring sparse solutions. Standard formulations of generalized linear models cannot immediately accommodate categorical outcomes with > 2 categories, i.e. multinomial outcomes, and require modifications to model specification and parameter estimation. Such modifications are relatively straightforward in a Classical setting but require additional theoretical and computational considerations in Bayesian settings, which can depend on the choice of prior distributions for the parameters of interest. While previous developments of the spike-and-slab lasso focused on continuous, count, and/or binary outcomes, we generalize the spike-and-slab lasso to accommodate multinomial outcomes, developing both the theoretical basis for the model and an expectation-maximization algorithm to fit the model. To our knowledge, this is the first generalization of the spike-and-slab lasso to allow for multinomial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.