Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157234›Full record

ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024

Surgical approaches of shoulder calcific tendonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emad Anam, Samah Zahran, Angelique Roy, Parham Daneshvar, Ryan T Bicknell, Ian Janssen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emad AnamOrthopedic Surgery Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Samah ZahranSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Angelique RoyHealth Sciences Library, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Parham DaneshvarDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Ryan T BicknellDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Ian JanssenSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Calcific tendonitis is a painful shoulder disorder characterized by calcium deposits (CDs) in the rotator cuff tendon. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the most efficient surgical procedure for calcific tendonitis. This includes the comparison between the three main surgical techniques: CD removal, CD removal with subacromial decompression (SAD) and CD removal with tendon repair with respect to functional outcomes and pain control scores. Methods: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched in February 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed, and participants were patients diagnosed with calcific tendonitis of one or more rotator cuff tendon based on diagnostic imaging who underwent shoulder calcific tendonitis surgery. Other shoulder pathology diagnoses were excluded. Meta-analyses were conducted for results that were sufficiently homogeneous in terms of statistical, clinical, and methodological characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine if effect sizes differed based on the patient's position during the surgery, physiotherapy, and follow-up time. Results: All surgical interventions resulted in significant improvements in shoulder function and pain control. There were no significant differences between CD removal vs. CD removal with SAD or CD removal vs. CD removal with tendon repair. However, there was a trend in favor of CD removal alone or CD removal with SAD approaches, as they provided better outcome scores than CD removal with tendon repair in terms of shoulder function and pain control. Conclusions: All surgical interventions provide substantial improvement in shoulder functions and pain control scores with no significant difference between these surgical techniques.

Indexed as

CalcificationMeta-analysisRotator cuff repairShoulderSubacromial decompressionSurgical approachesTendonitis

Identifiers

PMID39157234
PMCPMC11329037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.