ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024
Can magnetic resonance imaging distinguish clinical stages of frozen shoulder? A state-of-the-art review.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common disorder causing shoulder pain and limited motion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is expected to help diagnose FS and realize the disease stage if stage-specific features are present. We aimed to survey stage-related MRI findings of FS in the literature. Methods: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were searched with search terms "frozen shoulder" or "adhesive capsulitis" combined with "magnetic resonance imaging." Studies that discussed MRI findings in relation to FS stages were retrieved. The course of FS was divided into stages 1 to 4 according to Hannafin and Chiaia. Results: Two of the noncontrast-enhanced MRI findings were stage-related. T2 signal hyperintensity of the joint capsule was more frequent in stages 1 and 2. The axillary capsule thickness was greater in stages 1 and 2. However, these findings were also seen in the later stages to a lesser degree. Effusion around the long head of biceps, subcoracoid fat obliteration, and coracohumeral ligament thickening were common in FS but their relation to the stages was not evident. Signal enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI was not consistently linked to stages. Conclusion: T2 signal hyperintensity and axillary capsule thickening are characteristic of the early stages of FS, although MRI alone cannot completely define the disease stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.