Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157153›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Revisiting the Application of Machine Learning Approaches in Predicting Aqueous Solubility.

Tianyuan Zheng, John B O Mitchell, Simon Dobson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianyuan ZhengSchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SX, U.K.
John B O MitchellEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-6097
Simon DobsonSchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SX, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The solubility of chemical substances in water is a critical parameter in pharmaceutical development, environmental chemistry, agrochemistry, and other fields; however, accurately predicting it remains a challenge. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of some of the most popular machine learning modeling methods and molecular featurization techniques in predicting aqueous solubility. Although these methods were not implemented in a competitive environment, some of their performance surpassed previous benchmarks, offering gradual but significant improvements. Our results show that methods based on graph convolution and graph attention mechanisms demonstrated exceptional predictive abilities with high-quality data sets, albeit with a sensitivity to data noise and errors. In contrast, models leveraging molecular descriptors not only provided better interpretability but also showed more resilience when dealing with inherent noise and errors in data. Our analysis of over 4000 molecular descriptors used in various models identified that approximately 800 of these descriptors make a significant contribution to solubility prediction. These insights offer guidance and direction for future developments in solubility prediction.

Identifiers

PMID39157153
PMCPMC11325511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.