Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157092›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Churning-Motion-Assisted Bubble Removal: A Low-Cost Approach for Enhancing PDMS Mixture Quality.

Anoop Kanjirakat, Naresh Kumar Mani, Dolfred Vijay Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anoop KanjirakatDepartment of Aeronautical & Automobile Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Naresh Kumar ManiMicrofluidics, Sensors and Diagnostics (μSenD) Laboratory, Centre for Microfluidics, Biomarkers, Photoceutics and Sensors (μBioPS), Department of Biotechnology, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-3932
Dolfred Vijay FernandesDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4751-1855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bubble formation during mixing of the base elastomer and the curing agent for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) preparation presents a significant challenge, traditionally addressed through vacuum degassing or centrifugation. This study introduces a novel alternative for bubble removal in PDMS mixtures: a churning motion inspired by industrial dairy separation processes. A low-cost, manually operated, do-it-yourself (DIY) churning device has been developed for this purpose. We investigate the effectiveness of churning in eliminating bubbles across three different churning speeds and two PDMS mixtures with differing viscosities. The efficacy of this method is quantitatively assessed through the analysis of images captured during the churning process. The results demonstrate that bubble removal is notably more efficient in the PDMS mixture with a higher viscosity due to enhanced bubble coalescence. Among the tested speeds, fast churning emerges as the most effective, achieving bubble removal in less than 100 s-significantly outperforming the traditional vacuum degassing method, which requires over 3000 s. These findings highlight churning motion as a rapid, efficient, and cost-effective alternative for bubble removal in PDMS processing, promising significant advancements in material preparation techniques.

Identifiers

PMID39157092
PMCPMC11325519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.