ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2024
Introducing SPINE: A Holistic Approach to Synthetic Pulmonary Imaging Evaluation Through End-to-End Data and Model Management.
Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synthetic data in medical imaging within the EHDS: a path forward for ethics, regulation, and standards.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the evolving field of medical imaging and machine learning (ML), this paper introduces a novel framework for evaluating synthetic pulmonary imaging aiming to assess synthetic data quality and applicability. Our study concentrates on synthetic X-ray chest images, crucial for diagnosing respiratory diseases. We employ SPINE (Synthetic Pulmonary Imaging Evaluation) framework, a threefold synthetic images evaluation method including expert domain assessment, statistical data analysis and adversarial evaluation. In order to replicate and validate our methodology, we followed an End-to-End data and model management process which begins with a dataset of Normal and Pneumonia chest X-rays, generating synthetic images using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and training a baseline classifier, essential in the adversarial evaluation axis, testing synthetic images against real data assessing their predictive value. The critical outcome of our approach is the post-market analysis of synthetic images. This innovative method evaluates synthetic images using clinical, statistical, and scientific criteria independently from traditional generation performance metrics. This independent evaluation provides deep insights into the clinical and research effectiveness of the synthetic data. By ensuring these images mirror real data's statistical properties and maintain clinical accuracy, our framework establishes a new standard for the ethical and reliable use of synthetic data in medical imaging and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.