ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2024
Associations between Essential Amino Acid Intake and Functional Health Outcomes in Older Adults: Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2018.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term BMI trajectories and epigenetic age acceleration: the role of genetic risk for obesity.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Application of Omics in Donkey Meat Research: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Protein and Amino Acid Supplementation in Military Personnel: Accessibility, Prevalence, and Effectiveness.Nutrition todayArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The relationships between habitual essential amino acid (EAA) intake and body composition, muscle strength, and physical function in older US adults are not well defined. Objectives: This cross-sectional study evaluated associations between usual EAA intakes and body composition, muscle strength, and physical function in US adults ≥65 y. Methods: The Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) 2001-2018 was linked to the US Department of Agriculture Standard Reference database to access existing amino acid composition data for FNDDS ingredients. FNDDS ingredients without existing amino acid composition data were matched to similar ingredient codes with available data. Usual EAA, leucine, lysine, and sulfur-containing amino acid (SAA; methionine + cysteine) intakes (g/d) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2018 were calculated for individuals ≥65 y ( Results: EAA, leucine, lysine, and SAA intakes, covaried with physical activity level and usual protein intake, were not associated with muscle strength or self-reported physical function in males or females or with body composition in males. EAA intakes were positively associated with waist circumference in females (β ± SEM, 2.1 ± 0.6 cm, Conclusions: Habitual EAA, leucine, lysine, and SAA intakes, covaried with physical activity level and usual protein intake, were not associated with lean mass, muscle strength, or physical function in adults ≥65 y. However, EAA intakes, particularly lysine, were positively associated with measures of adiposity in older females.This trial was registered with the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/25V63) as osf.io/25v63).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.