ReviewInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine2024
Evaluations of Biomarkers CDX1 and CDX2 in Gastric Cancer Prognosis: A Meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of molecular and cellular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CDX2-UPK1B-PIK3IP1-PI3K/AKT signaling axis regulates gastric cancer cell invasion and migration and influences patient prognosis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- CXCL8 producing macrophages shape gastric cancer outcomes.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning-based survival prediction and key gene identification in cancer using gene expression and clinical data.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Stability of Blood DNA Methylation Across Two Timepoints in Three Cohorts.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CDX1 and CDX2 are homeobox-type transcription factors that are potential biomarkers and are associated with prognostic significance in intestinal-type gastric cancer early disease before lymph node metastasis is associated with better prognosis. In addition, the genes IDH 1 and IDH 2 previously known to be involved in brain cancer are implicated in cancer-related molecular signatures as a result new targeted personalized therapies may be possible. Our retrospective study determined the correlation between CDX markers and clinicopathologic data including survival in patients with gastric cancer. This study included studies from 1997 to December 2022 a meta-analysis to provide odds ratios (ORs) and relative risks (RRs). We discussed in detail the impact of IDH 1/2 on the prognosis of gastric cancer outcomes and potential therapeutic strategies. Our meta-analysis included 20 studies identifying 11,163 patients with gastric cancer. We found that CDX 1 overexpression was associated with better overall survival (pooled HR: 1.28) and CDX 2 expression and better 3-year survival (pooled HR: 1.64) and 5-year survival was the pooled HR was correlated 1 94 with both showing statistical correlation. Evidence suggests that IDH 1/2 mutations and CDX 1/2 overexpression are closely associated with metabolic abnormalities epigenetic changes and mutations evidence suggests the potential for novel targeted therapies in gastric cancer. CDX 1/2 overexpression is associated with a favorable prognosis in gastric cancer cases. Further studies are needed to explore the clinical significance of IDH 1/2 mutations and CDX 1/2 expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.