ArticleInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine2024
Predicting Survival in Glioblastoma Using Gene Expression Databases: A Neural Network Analysis.
Article in International journal of molecular and cellular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal brain tumor. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have the potential to make accurate predictions and improve decision making. The aim of this study was to create an ANN model to predict 15-month survival in GBM patients according to gene expression databases. Genomic data of GBM were downloaded from the CGGA, TCGA, MYO, and CPTAC. Logistic regression (LR) and ANN model were used. Age, gender, IDH wild-type/mutant and the 31 most important genes from our previous study, were determined as input factors for the established ANN model. 15-month survival time was used to evaluate the results. The normalized importance scores of each covariate were calculated using the selected ANN model. The area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistic and accuracy of prediction were measured to evaluate the two models. SPSS 26 was utilized. A total of 551 patients (61% male, mean age 55.5 ± 13.3 years) patients were divided into training, testing, and validation datasets of 441, 55 and 55 patients, respectively. The main candidate genes found were: FN1, ICAM1, MYD88, IL10, and CCL2 with the ANN model; and MMP9, MYD88, and CDK4 with LR model. The AUCs were 0.71 for the LR and 0.81 for the ANN analysis. Compared to the LR model, the ANN model showed better results: Accuracy rate, 83.3 %; H-L statistic, 6.5 %; and AUC, 0.81 % of patients. The findings show that ANNs can accurately predict the 15-month survival in GBM patients and contribute to precise medical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.