ReviewInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Artificial intelligence in individualized retinal disease management.
Review in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Clinician Review Time and Confidence with Optical Coherence Tomography Digital versus Print-Based Workflows: A Pilot Observer Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to the rapid development of modern computer technologies, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as an essential instrument for intelligent analysis across a range of fields. AI has been proven to be highly effective in ophthalmology, where it is frequently used for identifying, diagnosing, and typing retinal diseases. An increasing number of researchers have begun to comprehensively map patients' retinal diseases using AI, which has made individualized clinical prediction and treatment possible. These include prognostic improvement, risk prediction, progression assessment, and interventional therapies for retinal diseases. Researchers have used a range of input data methods to increase the accuracy and dependability of the results, including the use of tabular, textual, or image-based input data. They also combined the analyses of multiple types of input data. To give ophthalmologists access to precise, individualized, and high-quality treatment strategies that will further optimize treatment outcomes, this review summarizes the latest findings in AI research related to the prediction and guidance of clinical diagnosis and treatment of retinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.