Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156701›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Outcomes associated with total neoadjuvant therapy with non-operative intent for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Ebenezer Asare, Emily Venner, Hanna Batchelor, Jason Sanders, Paul Kunk, Traci Hedrick, Sook Hoang, Matthew Reilley, Tri Le, Charles Friel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ebenezer AsareDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Emily VennerUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Hanna BatchelorUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Jason SandersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Paul KunkDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Traci HedrickDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Sook HoangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Matthew ReilleyDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Tri LeDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Charles FrielDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Einsley-Marie JanowskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: To evaluate rates of clinical complete response (cCR), surgery-free survival, permanent ostomy-free survival, and factors associated with these outcomes in patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with intent for non-operative management of rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients treated with TNT for stage II-IV rectal adenocarcinoma (n=45) at our institution between 2013 - 2022 with curative intent. All patients received radiation with concurrent capecitabine and additional chemotherapy, either prior to or following chemoradiation (CRT), with intent for non-operative management. Response rates were determined based on post-treatment MRI and endoscopy. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to estimate the 1- and 2-year surgery- and permanent ostomy-free survivals. Cox regression was used to evaluate associations between surgery- and permanent ostomy-free survivals and various factors of interest, including patient and tumor characteristics and clinical response. Chi-squared analysis compared rates of cCR and surgery by sequence of TNT modality and cell count ratios. Results: Of the 45 patients treated with TNT, most patients had low-lying rectal tumors with a median distance of 4.1 cm from the anal verge (range, 0.0 - 12.0). Overall, 64.4% (n=29) achieved cCR after TNT. 13 patients (28.9%) underwent surgical resection following TNT, 12 of whom had incomplete response and one who elected to undergo surgery after reaching cCR. At median follow up of 32.0 months (range, 7.1 - 86.1), 22.2% (n=10) of patients had a permanent colostomy, with only 2 of these completed for tumor regrowth after cCR. At one and two years, respectively, surgery-free survival was 77.3% and 66.2%, and permanent ostomy-free survival was 90.9% and 78.2%. Rates of cCR were higher in patients who received CRT first compared to those who received chemotherapy first (72.2% vs. 33.3%, Conclusion: These results support evidence that TNT may be a non-surgical option for select patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who desire organ preservation. In this investigation at a single institution, the treatment response on 6-month post-CRT endoscopy was the best predictor of surgery- and permanent ostomy-free survival, which are outcomes that are important to patient quality of life. CRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy was associated with higher rates of cCR and lower rates of surgery compared to those treated with induction chemotherapy.

Indexed as

colostomyradiation therapyrectal adenocarcinomatotal neoadjuvant therapywatch and wait

Identifiers

PMID39156701
PMCPMC11328831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.