Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156677›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2024

Reliability and validity of the Italian Version of the Chase Nurse Manager Competencies Scale.

Dhurata Ivziku, Lucia Filomeno, Daniela Forte, Rosario Caruso, Gianluca Conte, Arianna Magon, Raffaella Gualandi, Marco Di Muzio, Daniela Tartaglini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The moderating role of self-efficacy in influencing the level of competencies among Middle Nurse Managers: A cross-sectional study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dhurata IvzikuDepartment of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Lucia FilomenoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Daniela ForteDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Rosario CarusoHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS San Donato Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca ConteHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS San Donato Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Arianna MagonHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS San Donato Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Raffaella GualandiDepartment of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Marco Di MuzioDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Daniela TartagliniDepartment of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties of the Chase Nurse Manager Competency Instrument (CNMCI) among Italian nurse managers and to provide further support for the scale's validity testing. Methods: An instrument translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated into Italian using the translation method, which included pre-translation (establishing equivalence), initial translation, pretesting, review, and administration. From August 2022 to June 2023, 349 nurse managers were recruited through a web survey from 31 public and private healthcare organizations in North, Central, and Southern Italy. Validity assessments included content and structural validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α coefficient and test-retest reliability. Results: The content validity confirmed all the items of the CNMCI in the Italian version, including the two measurement sections, "knowledge and understand" and "ability to implement and/or use." The instrument's item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.83 to 1.00, while the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) for both instrument sections was 0.97. The confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit. In the "knowledge and understand" section, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.978, and in the "ability to implement and/or use" section, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.976. The correlation coefficient between each dimension was 0.494-0.908. The test-retest reliability score was 0.82, suggesting good instrument consistency. Conclusions: Overall, the Italian CNMCI demonstrates good reliability and validity for measuring nurse managers' core competencies and supports the construct's multi-dimensionality. Also, our findings support the hierarchical nature of the factors, further supporting the validity of the instrument.

Indexed as

CompetencyNurse managersReliabilitySurveys and questionnairesValidity

Identifiers

PMID39156677
PMCPMC11329004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.