Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156662›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2024

Ninety years of pulse oximetry: history, current status, and outlook.

Valentina Quaresima, Marco Ferrari, Felix Scholkmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pulse Oximetry-A Perioperative Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valentina QuaresimaUniversity of L'Aquila, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Science, L'Aquila, Italy.
Marco FerrariUniversity of L'Aquila, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Science, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3041-2917
Felix ScholkmannUniversity Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Department of Neonatology, Neurophotonics and Biosignal Processing Research Group, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-4852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: This year, 2024, marks the 50th anniversary of the invention of pulse oximetry (PO), which was first presented by Takuo Aoyagi, an engineer from the Nihon Kohden Company, at the 13th Conference of the Japanese Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering in Osaka in 1974. His discovery and the development of PO for the non-invasive measurement of peripheral arterial oxygenation represents one of the most significant chapters in the history of medical technology. It resulted from research and development efforts conducted by biochemists, engineers, physicists, physiologists, and physicians since the 1930s. Aim: The objective of this work was to provide a narrative review of the history, current status, and future prospects of PO. Approach: A comprehensive review of the literature on oximetry and PO was conducted. Results and Conclusions: Our historical review examines the development of oximetry in general and PO in particular, tracing the key stages of a long and fascinating story that has unfolded from the first half of the twentieth century to the present day-an exciting journey in which serendipity has intersected with the hard work of key pioneers. This work has been made possible by the contributions of numerous key pioneers, including Kurt Kramer, Karl Matthes, Glenn Millikan, Evgenii M. Kreps, Earl H. Wood, Robert F. Show, Scott A. Wilber, William New, and, above all, Takuo Aoyagi. PO has become an integral part of modern medical care and has proven to be an important tool for physiological monitoring. The COVID-19 pandemic not only highlighted the clinical utility of PO but also revealed some of the problems with the technology. Current research in biomedical optics should address these issues to make the technology even more reliable and accurate. We discuss the necessary innovations in PO and present our thoughts on what the next generation of PO might look like.

Indexed as

OximetryHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansOxygenOxygenarterial oxygenationarterial oxygen saturationCO-oximetryoximetrypulse oximeterpulse oximetry

Identifiers

PMID39156662
PMCPMC11330276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.