Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156609›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

The adult ADHD assessment quality assurance standard.

Marios Adamou, Muhammad Arif, Philip Asherson, Sally Cubbin, Laurence Leaver, Jane Sedgwick-Müller, Ulrich Müller-Sedgwick, Kobus van Rensburg, James Kustow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diversity of words and words for diversity.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marios AdamouSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Muhammad ArifAdult ADHD Clinic, Leicestershire Partnership National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Philip AshersonSocial Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sally CubbinAdult ADHD Clinic, Manor Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Laurence LeaverGreen Templeton College, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jane Sedgwick-MüllerHealth and Community Services, Government of Jersey, St Helier, Jersey.
Ulrich Müller-SedgwickHealth and Community Services, Government of Jersey, St Helier, Jersey.
Kobus van RensburgPrivate Practitioner, Northampton, United Kingdom.
James KustowAdult ADHD Service, Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) frequently persists into adulthood. There are practice guidelines that outline the requirements for the assessment and treatment of adults. Nevertheless, guidelines specifying what constitutes a good quality diagnostic assessment and report and the competencies required to be a specialist assessor are lacking. This can lead to variation in the quality and reliability of adult ADHD assessments. Poor quality assessments may not be accepted as valid indicators of the presence of ADHD by other clinicians or services, resulting in wasteful re-assessments and delays in providing treatment. To address this issue the UK Adult ADHD Network (UKAAN) proposes a quality framework for adult ADHD assessments - the Adult ADHD Assessment Quality Assurance Standard (AQAS). Methods: The co-authors agreed on five questions or themes that then guided the development of a set of consensus statements. An initial draft was reviewed and amended in an iterative process to reach a final consensus. Results: What constitutes a high-quality diagnostic assessment and report was agreed by consensus of the co-authors. The resulting guideline emphasises the need to evaluate impairment, describes core competencies required by the assessor and highlights the importance of linking the diagnosis to an appropriate post-diagnostic discussion. Assessments should be completed in the context of a full psychiatric and neurodevelopmental review, and need good interview skills, using a semi-structured interview with open questioning and probing to elicit real life examples of symptoms and impairments. It is recommended that 2 hours or more is required for an adequate assessment including both the diagnostic assessment and initial post-assessment discussions. Conclusion: The AQAS has been developed as a practical resource to support reliable and valid diagnostic assessments of adult ADHD. It is intended to complement formal training. A secondary objective is to empower patients by providing them with evidence-based information on what to expect from an assessment and assessment report.

Indexed as

adult ADHDadult attention deficit hyperactivity disorderdiagnostic assessmentpractice guidelinesquality standard assessment

Identifiers

PMID39156609
PMCPMC11327143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.