Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156546›Full record

ArticleJTCVS techniques2024

Assessing the accuracy of a multisection robotic bronchoscope prototype in localization and targeting of small pulmonary lesions.

Jorind Beqari, Jacob Hurd, Fumitaro Masaki, Bassel Tfayli, Hussein Kharroubi, Masahito Naito, Franklin King, Yolonda Colson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jorind BeqariDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Jacob HurdDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Fumitaro MasakiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Bassel TfayliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Hussein KharroubiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Masahito NaitoDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Franklin KingDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Yolonda ColsonDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Robotic bronchoscopy (RB) has emerged as a novel technique to address issues with the biopsy of small peripheral lung lesions. The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess the accuracy of a novel multisection robotic bronchoscope compared with current standards of care. Methods: This is a prospective, single-blind, comparative study where the accuracy of a multisection RB was compared against the accuracy of standard electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (EM-NB) during lesion localization and targeting. Five blinded subjects of varying bronchoscopy experience were recruited to use both RB and EM-NB in a swine lung model. Accuracy of localization and targeting success was measured as the distance from the center of pulmonary targets at each anatomic location. Subjects used both RB and EM-NB to navigate to 4 pulmonary targets assigned using 1:1 block randomization. Differences in accuracy and time between navigation systems were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: Of the 40 total attempts per modality, successful targeting was achieved on 90% and 85% of attempts utilizing RB and EM-NB, respectively. Furthermore, RB demonstrated significantly lower median distance to the real-time EM target (1.1 mm; interquartile range [IQR], 0.6-2.0 mm) compared with EM-NB (2.6 mm; IQR, 1.6-3.8) ( Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that the multi-section RB prototype allows for improved localization and targeting of small peripheral lung nodules compared with current nonrobot bronchoscopy modalities.

Indexed as

interventional bronchoscopylung cancernavigational bronchoscopypulmonary nodulesrobotic bronchoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39156546
PMCPMC11329203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.