ReviewCureus2024
Optimizing Glioma Resection Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance in Neurosurgery.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative technological advances and new frontiers in precision glioma surgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- The efficacy of minimally invasive intraoperative ultrasound in endoscopic pituitary surgery.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Advances in Preoperative and Intraoperative Technologies for Safe Resection of Gliomas in Cognitive Regions.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Weight of Eloquence in Motor Area Glioblastoma: Oncologic Outcome After nTMS-Guided Surgical Resection.NeuroSci · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in enhancing glioma resection outcomes within neurosurgical procedures. Given the complexity and variability of gliomas, achieving precise and safe resections is challenging, necessitating the use of advanced imaging techniques like iMRI. This technology provides real-time, high-resolution insights during surgery, allowing for adaptations based on surgical dynamics and brain shifts. Our comprehensive search across multiple databases selected five significant studies that collectively demonstrate the beneficial impact of iMRI. These studies highlight its role in significantly improving the extent of tumor resection and suggest potential enhancements in both immediate and long-term patient outcomes. The findings indicate that iMRI facilitates more aggressive yet safe resections, particularly in high-risk glioma cases. However, the implementation of iMRI in clinical practice requires careful consideration of training, resource allocation, and the potential variability in outcomes due to study design heterogeneity. Future research should focus on randomized controlled trials to better understand the cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits of iMRI, promoting its wider adoption in neurosurgical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.