ArticleCureus2024
Variations and National Perspectives on Evaluation and Management of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: An In-Depth Survey Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are vulnerable to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which increases their morbidity and mortality. There is a significant overlap of clinical features of neonatal VAP with other pulmonary pathologies, particularly in preterm infants, which can make the definitive diagnosis and management of VAP challenging. Objective Our study surveyed NICU providers across the United States to understand the perspectives and variations in neonatal VAP diagnostic and management practices. Methods The REDCap survey was distributed to the actively practicing members of the Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (SoNPM) of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data from the respondents. Results Of 254 respondents, the majority (86.6%, 220) were neonatologists and had a relatively even geographical distribution. Most (75.9%, 193) stated that they would perform a gram stain and respiratory culture as part of a sepsis workup irrespective of the patient's duration on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV); 224 (88.2%) of providers preferred the endotracheal aspiration (ETA) technique to collect specimens. In cases where a positive respiratory culture was present, VAP (52.4%, 133) was the predominantly assigned diagnosis, followed by pneumonia (27.2%, 69) and ventilator-associated tracheitis (VAT) (9.8%, 25). Respondents reported a prescription of intravenous gentamicin (70%, 178) and vancomycin (41%, 105) as the initial empiric antibiotic drugs, pending final respiratory culture results. Most respondents (55.5%, 141) opted for seven days of antibiotics duration to treat VAP. The reported intra-departmental variation among colleagues in acquiring respiratory cultures and prescribing antibiotics for VAP was 48.8% (124) and 37.4% (95), respectively, with slightly more than half (53.5%, 136) of providers reporting having VAP prevention guidelines in their units. Conclusion The survey study revealed inconsistencies in the investigation, diagnostic nomenclature, choice of antibiotic, and treatment duration for neonatal VAP. Consequently, there is a pressing need for further research to establish a clear definition and evidence-based criteria for VAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.