ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of the Effect of Thermoforming Process and Simulated Aging on the Mechanical Properties of Clear Aligner Material.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ageing effects on chemical, physical, mechanical, and morphological properties of clear aligners - a systematic review.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Pooled it
- Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printable Aligner Resins: An In Vitro Study with FTIR Chemical Characterization.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Thermoforming time variability of PET-G and TPU aligner sheets across consecutive thermoforming cycles: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative Assessment of Dimensional Accuracy and Fit of Aligners Manufactured by Direct Printing and Thermoforming: AnTurkish journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Force systems of direct printed and thermoformed aligners with different trimlines during rotational movements: an in vitro analysis.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Biofilm Formation by Oral Microorganisms on Clear Aligner Materials: Influence of Mouthwash Exposure.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Article
- Can Clear Aligners Release Microplastics That Impact the Patient's Overall Health? A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparative evaluation of lower incisor intrusion using conventional method and frog staging protocol in clear aligners: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.Journal of orthodontic science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Choosing the optimal aligner material on the market is crucial to ensure constant forces for tooth displacement. Processes like manufacturing and intraoral usage can result in the degradation of certain properties, which can affect the overall efficacy of treatment. Objective The objective of the study is to compare the surface roughness and flexural modulus of two aligner materials following the processes of thermoforming and aging. Materials and methods Two groups of 12 samples each were tested: Group 1 consisted of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G) and Group 2 of zendura-polyurethane (PU). The groups were tested at three time points: T0 - pre-thermoformed; T1 - after thermoforming; T2 - after thermoforming and aging. The surface roughness and the flexural modulus were evaluated. One-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test was conducted to compare the changes within each group across the three times. An independent t-test was done to compare the values between the two groups at each time point. The statistical tests were performed using SPSS software version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P-values >0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results There was a significant change in the surface roughness post-aging in Group 2 (p=0.03) and flexural strength within Group 1 (p=0.031) and Group 2 (p=0.06) across the three time points. Comparing the changes within the three time points in Group 1, significant changes were observed between T0-T1 (p=0.045) and T0-T2 (p=0.07). In Group 2, significant changes were observed between T0-T2 (p=0.012). Comparing the flexural strength between the two groups, significant differences were observed at T0 (p=0.012) and T1 (p=0.001). Conclusion The aging process affected the surface roughness in Zendura (PU). The thermoforming and aging process resulted in reduced flexural strength in both Zendura (PU) and Duran groups (PET-G).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.