Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156325›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Role of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Horia Cotan, Cristian Iaciu, Cornelia Nitipir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Horia CotanOncology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, ROU.
Cristian IaciuOncology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, ROU.
Cornelia NitipirClinic of Oncology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted among 65 patients diagnosed with stage IV colorectal cancer who received treatment and follow-up at the Oncology Department of Elias Emergency University Hospital in Bucharest, Romania, from January 2016 to January 2024. Patient data were collected, including demographic information, tumor characteristics, and laboratory parameters. The mGPS was calculated based on serum albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Patients were stratified into the following three mGPS categories: 0 (normal CRP and albumin), 1 (elevated CRP or hypoalbuminemia), and 2 (elevated CRP and hypoalbuminemia). Results Of the 65 patients included, 33 (50.8%) were male and 32 (49.2%) were female, with a mean age of 63.7 years. According to mGPS, 25 (38.5%) patients scored 0, 30 (46.2%) scored 1, and 10 (15.4%) scored 2. The median overall survival (OS) was 53 months (95% confidence interval (CI) = 23.512-82.488), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23 months (95% CI = 19.244-26.756). Although numerical differences in the median PFS and OS were observed between treatment groups, these differences were not statistically significant (PFS: p = 0.292; OS: p = 0.5). Conclusions The mGPS is a useful prognostic tool in mCRC, providing insights into patient survival outcomes. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings and clarify the role of mGPS in guiding clinical decision-making for mCRC patients.

Indexed as

body mass index (bmi)colorectal cancerglasgow prognostic scoreinflammationprognostic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39156325
PMCPMC11330632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.