ReviewCureus2024
Decompressive Craniectomy: From Ancient Practices to Modern Neurosurgery.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical strategy that expels a parcel of the cranium to relieve pressure on a swollen or herniating brain. This review article explores the history of DC, from its ancient roots in trepanning to its contemporary applications. It then examines the mechanisms by which DC reduces intracranial pressure (ICP) and improves cerebral blood flow. The article highlights the efficacy of DC in treating patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and other conditions that cause increased ICP. However, it also acknowledges the potential complications of DC, such as infection and bleeding. The ethical considerations surrounding DC are explored in detail, particularly the challenging decision-making process for patients who are unable to give consent. A specific focus is given to the use of DC in pediatric patients, where the developing brain is especially vulnerable to pressure changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.