ArticleCureus2024
From Pregnancy Pains to Paralysis: An Erroneous Intrathecal Digoxin Administration Case Report and Review of Medical Errors.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digoxin is a Na-K ATPase inhibitor commonly used to treat heart failure and atrial fibrillation. It is only approved for oral or intravenous (IV) use. There is no approved indication for intrathecal administration. Only four previously reported cases of intrathecal digoxin administration in pregnant patients are in the literature. We present a patient who had an unfortunate case of erroneous intrathecal Digoxin administration following an elective Cesarean section. Post-delivery, the patient's mental status deteriorated. She became unresponsive and remained comatose for 11 days. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed diffuse, patchy hyperintensities involving bilateral frontotemporal lobes and basal ganglia. A spine MRI showed extensive cervical and thoracic cord edema. At discharge, the patient was paraplegic with no sensation or motor response below the level of T10. At the 90-day follow-up, she had intact mental status and minimal improvement in motor strength and sensation below T10 and was reportedly breastfeeding. This is an unfortunate case of severe neurological deficits resulting from a grave medical error, which continues to be a prevalent issue in the United States healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.