Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156237›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Perioperative Challenges: Analysis of Surgical Complications in Screening Lung Carcinoma Patient.

Miljana Poparić, Jovan Baljak, Ivan Ergelašev

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miljana PoparićOncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, SRB.
Jovan BaljakOncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, SRB.
Ivan ErgelaševClinic for Thoracic Surgery, Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, SRB.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction In September 2020, the Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina (IPBV) started a lung cancer screening program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. However, the frequency of postoperative complications in VATS anatomical lung resections among patients enrolled in the screening program has not been adequately studied. This study aims to compare the frequency of surgical complications and length of hospital stay between patients enrolled in the screening program and a control group. Methods Retrospective, observational, monocentric, non-randomized study was conducted at the IPBV in Sremska Kamenica. The study included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer who underwent anatomic pulmonary resection with mediastinal lymphadenectomy for therapeutic purposes. The patients were divided into two groups: the first group consisted of 34 patients who participated in the lung carcinoma screening program, while the second control group consisted of 102 patients. Over the past three years, all patients identified with nodules suspicious of malignancy during the screening program were sequentially enrolled in the screening group. For the control group, patients were selected based on a matching process to ensure valid statistical comparisons with the screening group. They were matched in a 3:1 ratio with patients from the screening group based on criteria including gender, disease stage, pathohistological type of cancer, tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage of the disease, and degree of surgical resection. Patients were monitored for demographic parameters, smoking status, presence of comorbidities and prior oncological diseases, pulmonary function parameters, level of pre-operational risk, the number of lymph nodes removed by biopsies, spread through alveolar spaces (STAS), and the occurrence of complications after surgery (infection, bleeding, air leak, presence of adhesions), re-drainage, and length of hospital stay. Results The patients in the screening group had a higher incidence of infections, bleeding, prolonged air leak, and required re-drainage after surgery compared to the control group. Patients from the screening program with a high operative risk, prolonged air leak, and pleural adhesions had a statistically significant higher hospital stay longer than the control group. Conclusions This research emphasizes the importance of screening programs for detecting lung cancer in the early stages. However, it also highlights the need for further research to reduce surgical complications and improve therapeutic interventions for patients in the screening program.

Indexed as

air leaklength of hospital stayscreeningsurgical complicationsvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats)

Identifiers

PMID39156237
PMCPMC11329326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.