ArticleFarmaceuticos comunitarios2023
[Pharmacovigilance of vaccines against COVID-19 in community pharmacies. Results with the first dose].
Article in Farmaceuticos comunitarios, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Pharmacovigilance of vaccines against COVID-19 in community pharmacies. Results after the second dose and comparison between both].Farmaceuticos comunitarios · 2023Article
- Impact, Trends, and Visibility of Scientific Publications on Neurological Effects of COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Analysis.Journal of global infectious diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Detection, reporting and monitoring of suspected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) in users of community pharmacies and their impact on health and daily life. Methods: Design: prospective observational. Subjects: people vaccinated against COVID-19, of legal age, who signed informed consent. Variables: number and percentage of participants who had at least one ADR. Number, type and frequency of possible reactivity. Impact on your daily life. The study was approved by CEIm-G (Exp. 2021-007). Results: 10 pharmacies from Pontevedra and 2 from Ourense collaborated. 781 cases, 488 (62.5%) women. Age 56.8 (SD=17.9) years. 389 (49.8%) in risk group.495 (63.4%) vaccinated, 321 women (65.8%) and 174 (59.4%) men, reported at least one ADR: 236 (53.0%) Comirnaty®, 157 (82.6%) Vaxzevria®, 69 (66.3%) Spikevax® and 33 (80.5) Janssen®.1,367 ADR were recorded. The most prevalent: pain at the injection point 375 (48.0%), tiredness/fatigue 170 (21.8%), chills 118 (15.1%), headache 117 (15.0%), muscle pain 112 (14.3%) and fever 98 (12.5%).Of the 495 respondents with ADR, 77 (15.6%) needed professional help: from the family doctor 30 (39.0%), 9 (11.7%) in the emergency department, 1 (1.3%) in the hospital and 37 (48.1%) in the pharmacy. 118 (15.1%) were unable to carry out their daily activity.ADR were reported from 264 (53.3%) vaccinated. Conclusions: The number of vaccinated people who reported having suffered RA was high. Pain at the injection site the most prevalent. Half were treated at the pharmacy. Although they were generally mild, they markedly affected his daily life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.