Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156145›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2024

Donor Perceptions and Preferences of Telemedicine and In-Person Visits for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation.

Ellie Kim, Hannah C Sung, Katya Kaplow, Victoria Bendersky, Carolyn Sidoti, Abimereki D Muzaale, Jasmine Akhtar, Macey Levan, Suad Esayed, Amir Khan and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07206069 (Telemedicine for Evaluation and Counseling of Living Kidney Donor Candidates), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07206069 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Telemedicine for Evaluation and Counseling of Living Kidney Donor Candidates

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2026 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsHealthy, Living Kidney DonationArmsStandard Care (in control arm), Telemedicine Shared Decision-Making
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ellie KimDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hannah C SungDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Katya KaplowDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Victoria BenderskyDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Carolyn SidotiDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Abimereki D MuzaaleDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jasmine AkhtarDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Macey LevanDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Suad EsayedDepartment of Medicine, University of California Irvine, California, USA.
Amir KhanDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Christina MejiaDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Fawaz Al AmmaryDepartment of Medicine, University of California Irvine, California, USA.

Funding

Telemedicine for Evaluation and Counseling of Living Kidney Donor CandidatesK23DK129820 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI AL AMMARY, FAWAZ · 2021 to 2025
$985k
Perioperative and long-term risks following nephrectomy in older live kidney donorsK08AG065520 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MUZAALE, ABIMEREKI D · 2020 to 2024
$855k
Development of a Machine Learning Model for Liver TransplantationF32DK124962 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BENDERSKY, VICTORIA ANNE · 2020 to 2022
$254k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG065520NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK124962NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK129820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Living kidney donor evaluation is a lengthy and complex process requiring in-person visits. Access to transplant centers, travel costs, lost wages, and dependent care arrangements are barriers to willing donors initiating evaluation. Telemedicine can help streamline and epedite the evaluation process. We aimed to deeply understand donor experiences and preferences using hybrid telemedicine video/in-person visits to ease access to donor evaluation or counseling. Methods: We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with donors or donor candidates who completed their evaluation through telemedicine/in-person, or in-person only visits at a tertiary transplant center between November 27, 2019 and March 1, 2021. Enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (interviews with 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Eight themes were identified as follows: (i) reducing financial and logistical burdens (minimizing travel time and travel-related expenses), (ii) enhancing flexibility with scheduling (less time off work and child or family caregiver arrangements), (iii) importance of a walkthrough and establishing shared understanding, (iv) supporting information with technology and visual aids, (v) key role of the coordinator, (vi) preferred visit by provider role (meeting donor surgeon in-person to create rapport and engaging primary care provider in donor evaluation/follow-up), (vii) comparing modality differences in human connection, and (viii) opportunity for family and support network engagement (allowing loved ones to be involved in telemedicine visits irrespective of geographic locations and pandemic restrictions). Conclusion: Telemedicine/in-person hybrid model can make donor evaluation more accessible and convenient. Our findings help inform about determinants that influence the adoption of telemedicine to initiate donor evaluation to motivate willing donors. In addition, our results call for policy and legislation that support telemedicine services for living donor kidney transplantation across states.

Indexed as

attitudesdelivery of health carekidney transplantationliving donorsnephrectomytelehealth

Identifiers

PMID39156145
PMCPMC11328557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.