Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39156046›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based workflow for the prioritization of patient portal messages.

Jie Yang, Jonathan So, Hao Zhang, Simon Jones, Denise M Connolly, Claudia Golding, Esmelin Griffes, Adam C Szerencsy, Tzer Jason Wu, Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jie YangDepartment of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Jonathan SoDepartment of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-2476
Hao ZhangDepartment of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-4347
Simon JonesDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Denise M ConnollyClinical Access Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Claudia GoldingClinical Access Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Esmelin GriffesClinical Access Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Adam C SzerencsyDepartment of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Tzer Jason WuClinical Access Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Yindalon AphinyanaphongsDepartment of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Vincent J MajorDepartment of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-3458

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Accelerating demand for patient messaging has impacted the practice of many providers. Messages are not recommended for urgent medical issues, but some do require rapid attention. This presents an opportunity for artificial intelligence (AI) methods to prioritize review of messages. Our study aimed to highlight some patient portal messages for prioritized review using a custom AI system integrated into the electronic health record (EHR). Materials and Methods: We developed a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based large language model using 40 132 patient-sent messages to identify patterns involving high acuity topics that warrant an immediate callback. The model was then implemented into 2 shared pools of patient messages managed by dozens of registered nurses. A primary outcome, such as the time before messages were read, was evaluated with a difference-in-difference methodology. Results: Model validation on an expert-reviewed dataset ( Discussion: Our work shows great promise in improving care when AI is aligned with human workflow. Future work involves audience expansion, aiding users with suggested actions, and drafting responses. Conclusion: Many patients utilize patient portal messages, and while most messages are routine, a small fraction describe alarming symptoms. Our AI-based workflow shortens the turnaround time to get a trained clinician to review these messages to provide safer, higher-quality care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencenatural language processingpatient portalssupervised machine-learningtriage

Identifiers

PMID39156046
PMCPMC11328532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.