ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024
FOXP3 serum concentration; a likely predictor of CIN and cervical cancer: Secondary analysis from a case control study at a clinic in South western Uganda.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Significance of Tumor Infiltrating T-Helper and Regulatory Cells in Bulgarian Cervical Cancer Patients.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum P16ink4A and FOX-P3 Concentrations for Detection of Cervical Lesions Among Women Attending a Cervical Cancer Clinic in Western Uganda: A Case-Control Study.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomarkers including Forkhead/winged-helix transcription factor box P3 have been proposed in immunohistochemical techniques to diagnose cervical lesions, but can be objectively quantified and measured in blood using methods that can be standardised. In this study we quantified the serum FOXP3 concentrations and assessed their association with cervical lesions at the cervical cancer clinic of Mbarara Regional Hospital (MRRH) Southwestern Uganda. We performed secondary analysis on archived serum samples from a previous unmatched case control study in which we recruited 90 cervical cancer (CC) cases, 90 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) cases before any form of treatment and 90 controls. Clinical and demographic data were recorded. We measured FOXP3 concentrations using quantitative ELISA. We performed descriptive statistics and logistic regression in STATA 17 and took P-values of < 0.05 as statistically significant. The mean concentration of FOXP3 was higher in serum samples from CC cases compared with CIN cases and controls, and this difference was statistically significant (P value < 0.001). More than half (52/90,58 %) of serum samples from CC cases had FOXP3 concentrations greater than 0.0545 ng/ml (P value < 0.001). Increase serum FOXP3 expression was not associated with CIN. Increase in serum FOXP3 concentrations were observed to increase the chances of CC by 2 times (OR: 2.094, P value 0.038, 95 % CI: 1.042---4.209). Serum FOXP3 is likely associated with cervical lesions especially CC in our study population. Serum FOXP3 testing may be useful in resource limited settings to aid detection of such lesions given the challenges associated with cytology and VIA. We recommend diagnostic utility studies for circulating FOXP3 as a biomarker for detection of cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.