Observational studyFarmaceuticos comunitarios2024
[Design of a Tool for Patient Classification Based on Pharmacotherapeutic Attitudes].
Observational study in Farmaceuticos comunitarios, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of the level of polypharmacy in patients from an isolated rural area: effect of age, sex, and chronic diseases.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Perception and relief of pain exhibit variability among individuals. Age, gender, ethnicity, educational level, actual stress level, mood, or medical conditions can modify the personal interpretation of pain and responses to pharmacological treatment. These differences may play a significant role in the effects, sometimes unwanted, of analgesic treatment. Objectives: Define patient typologies with Failed Back Syndrome regarding attitudes toward the disease, treatment, healthcare, and the follow-up they receive from their healthcare professionals. Create a tool for patient profile identification. Materials and Methods: A clinical case series study, observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional. Study population: patients from the Pain Unit of Nuestra Señora de La Candelaria University Hospital (HUNSC) in Tenerife, conducted in three phases: collection of medical history data (F0), initial visit (F1), and personal interview (F2). Results: Five patient typologies are obtained based on responses to 17 items. Regression equations are calculated from these responses to predict the patient type. They are grouped into "Classics," "Dependents," "Critics," "Unconscious," and "Responsible." Additionally, two tools with 17 items and another with 7 optimized items are developed to simplify the process. Conclusions: These tools enable Community Pharmacy (CP) to identify patients based on their characteristics to direct personalized strategies for each of them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.