ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2024
Unveiling hidden outcomes in malignant gastric outlet obstruction research - insights from a "Pancreas 2000" review.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Biliopancreatic Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: The emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Anastomoses of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Multicentric Experience.Cancers · 2025Article
- Revisiting malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Where do we stand?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound guided-gastroenterostomy is the best choice in the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Treatment of choice for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: More than clearing the road.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) is a major condition affecting patients with periampullary tumors, including pancreatic cancer. The current treatment options include surgical gastroenterostomy, endoscopic stenting and more recently EUS-guided gastroenterostomy. Most studies comparing the outcomes of the three procedures focus on technical success, clinical success and safety. Several "occult" outcomes relevant to the patient's viewpoints and perspective may ultimately impact on cancer-related and overall survival, such as body mass composition, nutritional biomarkers, chemotherapy tolerance and patient-reported quality of life. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of potential key outcomes that should be explored in future comparative research around mGOO treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.