ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024
Automatic detection of fish scale circuli using deep learning.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data Augmentation for Enhanced Fish Detection in Lake Environments: Affine Transformations, Neural Filters, SinGAN.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Identifying escaped farmed salmon from fish scales using deep learning.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Validating Atlantic salmon (Salmo Salar) scale reading by genetic parent assignment and PIT-tagging.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teleost fish scales form distinct growth rings deposited in proportion to somatic growth in length, and are routinely used in fish ageing and growth analyses. Extraction of incremental growth data from scales is labour intensive. We present a fully automated method to retrieve this data from fish scale images using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Our pipeline of two CNNs automatically detects the centre of the scale and individual growth rings (circuli) along multiple radial transect emanating from the centre. The focus detector was trained on 725 scale images and achieved an average precision of 99%; the circuli detector was trained on 40 678 circuli annotations and achieved an average precision of 95.1%. Circuli detections were made with less confidence in the freshwater zone of the scale image where the growth bands are most narrowly spaced. However, the performance of the circuli detector was similar to that of another human labeller, highlighting the inherent ambiguity of the labelling process. The system predicts the location of scale growth rings rapidly and with high accuracy, enabling the calculation of spacings and thereby growth inferences from salmon scales. The success of our method suggests its potential for expansion to other species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.