ArticleInternational journal of biomedical imaging2024
Presegmenter Cascaded Framework for Mammogram Mass Segmentation.
Article in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MB-SwinRefiner: Mammographic Mass Segmentation with Probability-Guided Residual Refinement.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Hybrid MICO-LAC Segmentation with Panoptic Tumor Instance Analysis for Dense Breast Mammograms.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of breast masses in mammogram images is essential for early cancer diagnosis and treatment planning. Several deep learning (DL) models have been proposed for whole mammogram segmentation and mass patch/crop segmentation. However, current DL models for breast mammogram mass segmentation face several limitations, including false positives (FPs), false negatives (FNs), and challenges with the end-to-end approach. This paper presents a novel two-stage end-to-end cascaded breast mass segmentation framework that incorporates a saliency map of potential mass regions to guide the DL models for breast mass segmentation. The first-stage segmentation model of the cascade framework is used to generate a saliency map to establish a coarse region of interest (ROI), effectively narrowing the focus to probable mass regions. The proposed presegmenter attention (PSA) blocks are introduced in the second-stage segmentation model to enable dynamic adaptation to the most informative regions within the mammogram images based on the generated saliency map. Comparative analysis of the Attention U-net model with and without the cascade framework is provided in terms of dice scores, precision, recall, FP rates (FPRs), and FN outcomes. Experimental results consistently demonstrate enhanced breast mass segmentation performance by the proposed cascade framework across all three datasets: INbreast, CSAW-S, and DMID. The cascade framework shows superior segmentation performance by improving the dice score by about 6% for the INbreast dataset, 3% for the CSAW-S dataset, and 2% for the DMID dataset. Similarly, the FN outcomes were reduced by 10% for the INbreast dataset, 19% for the CSAW-S dataset, and 4% for the DMID dataset. Moreover, the proposed cascade framework's performance is validated with varying state-of-the-art segmentation models such as DeepLabV3+ and Swin transformer U-net. The presegmenter cascade framework has the potential to improve segmentation performance and mitigate FNs when integrated with any medical image segmentation framework, irrespective of the choice of the model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.