ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Changes in vitamin D status among adults from the COVID-19 pandemic to post-pandemic normality.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining Reference Intervals for Complete Blood Count and Micronutrient Parameters in Urban Bangladeshi Population.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- A decade-long assessment reveals persistent vitamin D deficiency and its associated factors in early-pregnant women from northern China (2016-2025).Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Demographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta Hospitalized Due to Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19: A Case Series of 13 Patients from Brazil.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Glutathione reductase modulates endogenous oxidative stress and affects growth and virulence in Avibacterium paragallinarum.Veterinary research · 2025Article
- Vitamin D Deficiency-Induced Proximal Myopathy in a Pediatric Patient During COVID-19 Lockdown: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted widespread lockdown measures globally, significantly impacting daily activities and outdoor exposure. This study investigates the effect of the pandemic on vitamin D levels and the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the adult population, with a focus on gender-specific differences. Methods: A total of 1525 adults from Henan Provincial People's Hospital were included. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were measured using the Elecsys® Vitamin D total kit on the Roche Cobas® 8000 analyzer. The Clinical Application Consensus on Vitamin D and Its Analogs defined deficiency as 25(OH)D levels below 20 ng/ml. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 and GraphPad Prism 8 software. Results: The overall 25(OH)D levels increased from 18.14 ng/ml [IQR: 13.78, 23.68] in 2022 to 19.15 ng/ml [IQR: 14.88, 25.01] in 2023 ( Discussion: This study demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted vitamin D levels, leading to an increased prevalence of deficiency, particularly among males. These findings highlight the critical importance of maintaining sufficient outdoor activities to ensure adequate vitamin D levels. The data underscore the need for public health strategies to address potential deficiencies during prolonged periods of limited outdoor exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.