Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155885›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Lung and Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy During Mechanically Assisted Deep Inspiration Breath-Holds: A Prospective Feasibility Trial.

Loïc Vander Veken, Geneviève Van Ooteghem, Benoît Ghaye, Ariane Razavi, David Dechambre, Xavier Geets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Loïc Vander VekenUCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
Geneviève Van OoteghemUCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
Benoît GhayeRadiology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Ariane RazaviRadiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
David DechambreRadiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Xavier GeetsUCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Radiation therapy for tumors subject to breathing-related motion during breath-holds (BHs) has the potential to substantially reduce the irradiated volume. Mechanically assisted and noninvasive ventilation (MANIV) could ensure the target repositioning accuracy during each BH while facilitating treatment feasibility through oxygen supplementation and a perfectly replicated mechanical support. However, there is currently no clinical evidence substantiating the use of MANIV-induced BH for moving tumors. The aim of this work was, therefore, to evaluate the technique's performance under real treatment conditions. Methods and Materials: Patients eligible for lung or liver stereotactic body radiation therapy were prospectively included in a single-arm trial. The primary endpoint corresponded to the treatment feasibility with MANIV. Secondary outcomes comprised intrafraction geometric uncertainties extracted from real-time imaging, tolerance to BH, and treatment time. Results: Treatment was successfully delivered in 92.9% (13/14) of patients: 1 patient with a liver tumor was excluded because of a mechanically induced gastric insufflation displacing the liver cranially by more than 1 cm. In the left-right/anteroposterior/craniocaudal directions, the recalculated safety margins based on intrafraction positional data were 4.6 mm/5.1 mm/5.6 mm and 4.7 mm/7.3 mm/5.9 mm for lung and liver lesions, respectively. Compared with the free-breathing internal target volume and midposition approaches, the average reduction in the planning target volume with MANIV reached -47.2% ± 15.3%, Conclusions: MANIV enables high treatment feasibility within a nonselected population. Accurate intrafraction tumor repositioning is achieved for lung tumors. Because of occasional intra-BH caudal drifts, pretreatment assessment of BH stability for liver lesions is, however, recommended.

Identifiers

PMID39155885
PMCPMC11327938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.