Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155859›Full record

ReviewOncology reports2024

Glioma lateralization: Focus on the anatomical localization and the distribution of molecular alterations (Review).

Nilgun Tuncel Cini, Manuela Pennisi, Sidika Genc, Demetrios A Spandidos, Luca Falzone, Panayiotis D Mitsias, Aristides Tsatsakis, Ali Taghizadehghalehjoughi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Primary Intracranial High Grade Congenital Glial Lesions (PIHGCL): A systematic review of case reports from 1985 to 2025.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nilgun Tuncel Cini *Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik 11230, Turkey.
Manuela Pennisi *Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Sidika Genc *Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik 11230, Turkey.
Demetrios A SpandidosLaboratory of Clinical Virology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Luca FalzoneDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.
Panayiotis D MitsiasDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Aristides TsatsakisDepartment of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Ali TaghizadehghalehjoughiDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik 11230, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known how the precise localization of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) predicts the direction of tumor spread in the surrounding neuronal structures. The aim of the present review is to reveal the lateralization of GBM by evaluating the anatomical regions where it is frequently located as well as the main molecular alterations observed in different brain regions. According to the literature, the precise or most frequent lateralization of GBM has yet to be determined. However, it can be said that GBM is more frequently observed in the frontal lobe. Tractus and fascicles involved in GBM appear to be focused on the corticospinal tract, superior longitudinal I, II and III fascicles, arcuate fascicle long segment, frontal strait tract, and inferior fronto‑occipital fasciculus. Considering the anatomical features of GBM and its brain involvement, it is logical that the main brain regions involved are the frontal‑temporal‑parietal‑occipital lobes, respectively. Although tumor volumes are higher in the right hemisphere, it has been determined that the prognosis of patients diagnosed with cancer in the left hemisphere is worse, probably reflecting the anatomical distribution of some detrimental alterations such as TP53 mutations, PTEN loss, EGFR amplification, and MGMT promoter methylation. There are theories stating that the right hemisphere is less exposed to external influences in its development as it is responsible for the functions necessary for survival while tumors in the left hemisphere may be more aggressive. To shed light on specific anatomical and molecular features of GBM in different brain regions, the present review article is aimed at describing the main lateralization pathways as well as gene mutations or epigenetic modifications associated with the development of brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesErbB ReceptorsGliomaHumansMutationPrognosisPTEN PhosphohydrolaseTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor ProteinsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMGMT protein, humanPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteinsanatomybrain regionsglioblastomalateralizationmolecular alterations

Identifiers

PMID39155859
PMCPMC11358673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.