Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155851›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2024

The curious physician: exploring the role of curiosity in professionalism, patient care, and well-being.

Till Johannes Bugaj, Tim Alexander Schwarz, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Christoph Nikendei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Till Johannes BugajDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg Medical Hospital, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8287-2635
Tim Alexander SchwarzDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg Medical Hospital, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0862-979X
Hans-Christoph FriederichDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg Medical Hospital, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4344-8959
Christoph NikendeiDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg Medical Hospital, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2839-178X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCuriosity is a fundamental human trait that drives learning and exploration. However, research on curiosity has received little attention in the medical field, despite its potential to enhance knowledge acquisition, work performance, and psychosocial well-being. This study aimed to address part of this gap by investigating physicians' perspectives on their personal experiences with curiosity and its role in their professional practice and medical training. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis qualitative study was conducted with 12 physicians from the University of Heidelberg Medical Hospital. Participants were contacted randomly

resultsThe interviewees highlighted three main areas regarding curiosity's importance [1]: as a driving force for (lifelong) education [2], in building empathetic physician-patient relationships, and [3] as a core quality of a good researcher. They primarily linked curiosity with positive emotions, while the non-expression of curiosity was associated with dissatisfaction, boredom, and exhaustion. Factors such as heavy workloads, time constraints, stress, and lack of autonomy inhibit their curiosity, while varied activities, professional exchange with colleagues, and exposure to new challenges foster it. Physicians' perspectives on the link between burnout and curiosity were not consistent. Interestingly, some viewed curiosity as protective against burnout, while others saw excessive curiosity as a potential source of frustration and burnout.

conclusionThis study represents the first attempt to explore physicians' perspectives on curiosity in medicine. The findings highlight the potential importance of curiosity in shaping medical professionalism and improving patient care. However, its pursuit is hampered by the challenging working conditions faced by doctors, suggesting a need for enhanced support and cultivation.

Indexed as

Exploratory BehaviorPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansProfessionalismQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Careburnoutburnout preventionexploratory behaviormedical educationmedicinephysician healthPhysicianswell-being

Identifiers

PMID39155851
PMCPMC11334747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.