Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155796›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2024

Development and validation of risk prediction model for adverse outcomes in trauma patients.

Qian Zhuang, Jianchao Liu, Wei Liu, Xiaofei Ye, Xuan Chai, Songmei Sun, Cong Feng, Lin Li

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qian ZhuangDepartment of Innovative Medical Research, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-9840-7822
Jianchao LiuDepartment of Innovative Medical Research, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8390-001X
Wei LiuDepartment of Innovative Medical Research, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0018-5351
Xiaofei YeDepartment of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3692-1285
Xuan ChaiOutpatient Department, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Songmei SunThe Second Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Cong FengDepartment of Emergency, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Innovative Medical Research, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7917-1173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of trauma patients is highly dependent on early medical diagnosis. By constructing a nomogram model, the risk of adverse outcomes can be displayed intuitively and individually, which has important clinical implications for medical diagnosis.

objectiveTo develop and evaluate models for predicting patients with adverse outcomes of trauma that can be used in different data availability settings in China.

methodsThis was a retrospective prognostic study using data from 8 public tertiary hospitals in China from 2018. The data were randomly divided into a development set and a validation set. Simple, improved and extended models predicting adverse outcomes were developed, with adverse outcomes defined as in-hospital death or ICU transfer, and patient clinical characteristics, vital signs, diagnoses, and laboratory test values as predictors. The results of the models were presented in the form of nomograms, and performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), precision-recall (PR) curves (PR-AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsOur final dataset consisted of 18,629 patients (40.2% female, mean age of 52.3), 1,089 (5.85%) of whom resulted in adverse outcomes. In the external validation set, three models achieved ROC-AUC of 0.872, 0.881, and 0.903, and a PR-AUC of 0.339, 0.337, and 0.403, respectively. In terms of the calibration curves and DCA, the models also performed well.

conclusionsThis prognostic study found that three prediction models and nomograms including the patient clinical characteristics, vital signs, diagnoses, and laboratory test values can support clinicians in more accurately identifying patients who are at risk of adverse outcomes in different settings based on data availability.

Indexed as

NomogramsWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedChinaFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC Curveadverse outcomesnomogramrisk prediction modelTrauma patients

Identifiers

PMID39155796
PMCPMC11334749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.