Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155719›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

The role of action concepts in physical reasoning: insights from late childhood.

Hélène Grandchamp des Raux, Tommaso Ghilardi, Christina Soderberg, Ori Ossmy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of action concepts in physical reasoning: insights from late childhood.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Minds in movement: embodied cognition in the age of artificial intelligence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hélène Grandchamp des RauxCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, 32 Torrington Square , London, WC1E 7JL, UK.
Tommaso GhilardiCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, 32 Torrington Square , London, WC1E 7JL, UK.
Christina SoderbergCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, 32 Torrington Square , London, WC1E 7JL, UK.
Ori OssmyCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, 32 Torrington Square , London, WC1E 7JL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7675-0890

Funding

British AcademyLeverhulme TrustUK Research and InnovationWaterloo FoundationWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental component of human cognition is the ability to intuitively reason about behaviours of objects and systems in the physical world without resorting to explicit scientific knowledge. This skill was traditionally considered a symbolic process. However, in the last decades, there has been a shift towards ideas of embodiment, suggesting that accessing physical knowledge and predicting physical outcomes is grounded in bodily interactions with the environment. Infants and children, who learn mainly through their embodied experiences, serve as a model to probe the link between reasoning and physical concepts. Here, we tested school-aged children (5- to 15-year-olds) in online reasoning games that involve different physical action concepts such as supporting, launching and clearing. We assessed changes in children's performance and strategies over development and their relationships with the different action concepts. Children reasoned more accurately in problems that involved supporting actions compared to launching or clearing actions. Moreover, when children failed, they were more strategic in subsequent attempts when problems involved support rather than launching or clearing. Children improved with age, but improvements differed across action concepts. Our findings suggest that accessing physical knowledge and predicting physical events are affected by action concepts, and those effects change over development. This article is part of the theme issue 'Minds in movement: embodied cognition in the age of artificial intelligence'.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCognitionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolConcept FormationFemaleHumansMaleProblem SolvingThinkingaction conceptschild developmentcognitive developmentphysical cognitionphysical reasoningvirtual tools

Identifiers

PMID39155719
PMCPMC11391279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.